It is the job of government to protect its members from the actions of others. It is not the job of the government to protect its members from their own actions. That's the difference between being a citizen and a subject.
CONTACT ME
ABOUT ME


July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Recent Entries
I'm Not A Racist
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics
Popularity Contests
Pictures from the wedding
Adam is Home!
The Heller Decision
Kanye West is a Poser
More Stupidity.
When is it OK to Refuse to Give a Birth Certificate to a US Citizen?
Humility? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.


Archives
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
Catagories
84.5 miles  67 posts
aquariums  3 posts
Art  2 posts
Atkins Updates  7 posts
BlogFests  21 posts
Bonnaroo  9 posts
College Football  24 posts
Commentary  273 posts
Entertainment  8 posts
Fiction  2 posts
Flotsam and Jetsam  5 posts
Fred Thompson  6 posts
Grandpappyhood  9 posts
Hobbies  1 posts
Humor  104 posts
Immigration  9 posts
just for fun  5 posts
K-Town Smackdown  1 posts
KNS v KCC  24 posts
Movie Quiz  26 posts
NaNoWriMo  4 posts
News  158 posts
Personal  355 posts
Photos  3 posts
Podcast  3 posts
Poker  3 posts
Politics  261 posts
Radio  1 posts
Religion  8 posts
Reviews  62 posts
Science  45 posts
Shooting  3 posts
Simply Surreal  16 posts
Sports  59 posts
Subjects, not Citizens  2 posts
War  55 posts
Blogs I Contribute To
Knoxville Tennessee Blog
Blog Roll

Daily Reads

The Agitator Radley Balko
Captains Quarters Ed Morrisey
Chattie Kat Tish
Domestic Psychology Cathy
Dr. Helen Helen Smith
Katie Allison Granju
Grouchy Old Cripple in Atlanta
Gut Rumbles(RIP)
Bill Hobbs
Hot Air
Inn of the Last Home Barry Wallace
Instapundit Glenn Reynolds
Les Jones
Michelle Malkin
Frank Murphy
Oh...Really? Lissa
Power Line
Right Wing News
Say Uncle
Donald Sensing
No Silence Here Michael Silence
View From the Porch Tam
Waiter Rant

Worthy Blogs
Rock Stars Against Live Earth
Adam Smith Blog
The Truth Laid Bear
Winds of Change
The Daily Brief
Daily Pundit
Andrew Ian Dodge
Dean Esmay
Armed and Dangerous
Blithering Idiot
Byte Back
Bo Cowgill
Country Store
The Dissident Frogman
ACDouglas.com
John Ellis
Catholicism Anew
Tal G. in Jerusalem
The Illuminated DonkeyKen Goldstein
Inappropriate ResponseMoira Breen
Junkyard Blog
The Kolkata Libertarian
Ken Layne
James Lileks
Lone PrairieJulie Neidlinger
Midwest Conservative Journal
On the Third HandKathy Kinsley
The Ornery AmericanOrson Scott Card
Planet PeschelBill Peschel
Possumblog
The Rat's Nest
Samizdata
Doc Searls
Sightseeing in Plato's Cave
Andrew Sullivan
The Talking Dog
Transterrestrial MusingsRand Simberg
Basic Training
Buzz MachineJeff Jarvis
Matt Welch

Links
Northview Youth Athletic Association
nyaabutton.jpg
101st.jpg
Reference Materials
News Links
Satire sites
Andy Borowitz
Knoxpatch.com
The Onion
Hosting by
hm_button.gif

Powered by
mt.gif



All original material on this site copyrighted 2002-2006 by Richard Hailey. All rights reserved.
Syndicate this site (XML)

July 20, 2008

I'm Not A Racist

So I'll call this guy an idiot lacking the brains to pull down his pants before he takes a crap.

That way he won't be offended.

July 13, 2008

Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

Let's talk about smoking for a minute. I don't smoke and never have. Probably never will unless I'm on fire. And there's nothing that can ruin a good dinner faster than somebody lighting up in a booth nearby.

But.

There's some fundamental dishonesty going on in the camp of the anti smokers,and it's resulting in some very bad law.

Let's look at the numbers with a little bit of reality.

According to the CDC, for 2007


So, by these numbers, 1000 smokers per 100,000 will die from it each year, or about 1%.

Hmmm. What about the other 99%?

We'll get back to them in a minute. First, let's see where they get all these scary numbers, like smoking will increase your risk of death by lung cancer up to 10 or 20 times.

The CDC tells us that roughly 36% of deaths due to smoking are cancer related, and of those, 78% are lung cancer deaths.

1000(deaths due to smoking)X 0.36(percentage of smoking related deaths due to cancer)X 0.78(percentage of cancer deaths that are lung cancer)=281 lung cancer deaths due to smoking per 100,000 people.

We need one more piece of information. The average lung cancer rate among the non smoking population is about 16 deaths per 100,000 people. ( average of men 17.1 and women 14.7)

281 (lung cancer deaths in smokers)/16 (lung cancer deaths in non smokers)=18.

This means that smokers are 18 times more likely to die of lung cancer than non-smokers.

Ok, so the scary commercials are right. But only partially. The initial risk of lung cancer, 16 per 100,000, is so low that multiplying it by 18 still means that 99,719 smokers will not die from lung cancer.

Hardly compelling is it?

"But Rich, what about all the other smoking related deaths that aren't cancer? Won't that change the numbers?"

Yep. But now we're back to those 99,000 smokers out of 100,000 who aren't dying from it each year. (Incidentally, these numbers include deaths from secondhand as well as primary smoke.)

The truth is that smoking does not result in death for the vast majority of those who smoke, yet you will never hear that during any debate on smoking laws.

In order to fully understand the risks associated with a behavior, you have to know two things. You have to know the increase in the risk, which the anti smokers are really good about, but you also have to know the baseline risk, which the anti smokers are very quiet about.

The problem for the anti-tobacco side is that the baseline risk is so low that if they publicized it, they would lose all traction. Or do you think the anti-smoking bans would have passed if the anti smoking warriors banners said

"90% of smokers will not die from smoking!"

And that is what bothers me. By giving people only half the information they need, they are manipulating them through fear, while pretending to inform them.

Whaddafuxup?

July 9, 2008

Popularity Contests

When did politics turn into high school popularity contests? When did a President's effectiveness become solely measured by his polling? For years we've heard nothing except how Bush's approval ratings prove he's a bad president, that his 30% numbers are an historic low, that his administration is an utter failure.

But somehow, Congress's 9% approval rating draws a pass.

And let's take a stroll through history for a moment. Just how popular was Abraham Lincoln during the first 3 years of the Civil War? If I remember my history correctly, his war was considered a failure as well. He was told to end it by the major media of the day. And how many people stood behind the Revolutionary War and the founding fathers? Last time I checked, their support ran around 30%, with an overwhelming majority of Americans either indifferent or actively opposed to the war for independence.

Sometimes, maybe even most times, doing what's right isn't going to make you popular. Remember high school? The cool kids, were they the ones who worked hard, studied hard, got the grades, and did what they were supposed to do? Or were they the ones who did the fun things, the glamorous things, lived on the edge, at least, as edgy as it can get in a suburban school.

Just like high school, politics is based on standards that reward conformity and mediocrity, or do you really believe that the two best people to run America are John McCain or Barack Obama?

It's no longer about doing what is right for America, but doing what's popular.

Posted by Rich at 12:38 PM | Politics | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)

July 7, 2008

Pictures from the wedding

adam%20sasha%20wedding%20003.JPG
The Groom and his Kilt...What's he wearin' underneath it?
webpic2.jpg
Isaac and Stephen in the kitchen...catering because they care!
webpic3.jpg
The bridal party and some old guy...
wedpic4.jpg
Waiting for the bride...better get used to that!
wedpic5.jpg
The bride and the old guy again...
wedpic6.jpg
The rings...
wedpic7.jpg
The kiss...
wedpic8.jpg
The cakes...
wedpic9.jpg
The ring bearer...
wedpic10.jpg
The flower girls...
wedpic12.jpg
The first dance...
wedpic13.jpg
The getaway car
wedpic11.jpg
Mr. and Mrs. Sasha and Adam Privett!

July 5, 2008

Adam is Home!

At midnight EDT on July 4th, he left Kuwait and traveled for nearly thirty hours before arriving home in Kodak for 18 days of leave.

He'll be getting married tomorrow evening by the shores of Douglas Lake, and leaving on a honeymoon Monday with his new bride.

He'll be back home around the 14th, and then headed back to Iraq around the 20th to finish his 15 month tour, at which time my new daughter, Sasha, will be heading to Colorado for college.

Kids grow so fast...

June 26, 2008

The Heller Decision

The Supreme Court today decided on a 5-4 basis that the Second Amendment confirms an individual right to keep and bear arms.

What this means is that 4 out of 9 Supreme Court Justices either cannot read simple English sentences, or that 4 out of 9 Justices would rather follow their own prejudices than the Constitution.

The fact that these 4 Justices are the most liberal is not a coincidence.

Posted by Rich at 6:40 PM | News | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

June 25, 2008

Kanye West is a Poser

Yep, you heard me right. He's nothing but a loudmouth who acts like he has a social agenda, but in reality, it's all about him.

How do I know this?

Remember a few years back during the benefit for New Orleans after Katrina, Kanye went off script to deliver an impassioned plea to the people of America. "They're killing us," he said, shortly before his famous "George Bush doesn't like black people." He was in a state of moral outrage as he railed against the injustices of the federal response to Katrina.

But as angry, offended, and outraged as he was then, he says nothing can compare or ever will compare with how offended he was at being booed by a Bonnarroo crowd, angered because his show started almost 2 hours late.

On his website, West wrote. "This is the most offended I've ever been ... this is the maddest I ever will be."

So let me get this straight: Kanye is more offended by being booed than by police shooting at looters in New Orleans? What a guy!

June 24, 2008

More Stupidity.

Yesterday, I pointed out Stacy Campfield's ridiculous post about refusing to issue birth certificates for US citizens based on the actions of their parents. Today, in the spirit of bipartisan snark, I am obliged to point out the ridiculous response coming from my old friend R. Neal at KnoxViews. Here is Randy's headline: (If link doesn't work, go to http://www.knoxviews.com/node/8240. Randy is funny sometimes about allowing links from my site to his.)

Slavery was a Better Immigration System?

Now, I've read Stacy's post in detail, and there's absolutely nothing in Stacy's post that can even be remotely construed as approval of slavery. Only a warped and twisted reading of the post in question could result in such an interpretation. Randy isn't stupid, and I'm relatively certain he's neither warped or twisted, so what gives? Is he that worked up about Campfield? Or was he just providing a little red meat for the monkeys in his echo chamber?

Hey, I never thought I'd be in the position of defending Campfield, but if you're going to ridicule a guy for the stupid things he says, and Campfield has said some fairly stupid things, you shouldn't need to make stuff up to do it.

June 23, 2008

When is it OK to Refuse to Give a Birth Certificate to a US Citizen?

According to Stacy Campfield, if you don't like their parents, the State does not have to issue a birth certificate. Mr.Campfield posts about his amendment that would prevent the state from issuing a birth certificate to a child born in the US to two illegal alien parents.

His "logic" goes like this:

(1) If both parents are here illegally, then they are not under our jurisdiction, and therefore, their baby is not automatically a citizen.
(2) Citizenship is a Federal matter, and birth certificates are issued by the State. Even if the child is a US citizen, the State has no obligation to issue a birth certificate.

Wow.

OK, let's apply a little bit of real world logic here, not the stuff that passes for it in the mirror maze of Mr. Campfield's mind. If a man is in this country illegally, he is subject to arrest and deportation. He is given a hearing to determine his status and that all applicable laws regarding his case are met. He has legal avenues to pursue to apply for asylum. If he is incarcerated during the process, he has civil rights that must be observed. If he commits a crime while in the US, he can be charged, tried, convicted and sentenced, regardless of his immigration status.

Now I'm not a lawyer, but the above seems to suggest that our illegal alien is certainly under local, state, and federal jurisdiction.

So much for point number one.

As for point number two, if Mr. Campfield had finished reading the 14th Amendment, he would have gotten to the part about "...No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." That's pretty simple to read, and it says that if a person is a citizen, then the state cannot pass any law that would abridge their rights and privileges, and withholding a birth certificate would certainly do that very thing.

I understand that we need to get control of immigration, but we need to do it intelligently, not with stupid amendments that will never stand up to a constitutional challenge. I don't care for the "anchor baby" loophole either but I don't see any way to close it without causing worse problems down the road.

June 5, 2008

Humility? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

Obama's speech:

...we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.

And

I face this challenge with profound humility.

All he needs to add to his act is water into wine and walking on water to achieve deity status. The Dems will probably even let him skip that whole messy crucifixion thing.